ext_15147 ([identity profile] jerrymcl89.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] rusty_halo 2006-10-18 02:50 am (UTC)

I've always felt that Brosnan did the most acting of any of the Bonds, even if I preferred Connery in the role. Connery has much more of a physical presence - he seems like he could kick your ass. Brosnan doesn't, but I like the jaded, world-weary quality he brings to the role - he doesn't just drink and womanize because he can, but because he's kind of damaged, and because he's chosen a career where he can die any minute. That quality declined a bit with each of his Bond films, but I liked it initially.

I'd point out that Bond films really are not the place for slashy subtext, but I'm sure you already know that :)

Post a comment in response:

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org