ext_21415 ([identity profile] nina-ds.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] rusty_halo 2008-01-27 06:34 pm (UTC)

Did they explain this in the text of the show?

They called it a slaving ship. I think the parallel to Earth slaving was fairly clear (even the reference to Sycorax).

Regardless, she still shot a retreating enemy in the back, and it was still wrong.

I'm not saying it's right. I'm saying it's a difficult decision and that she had a right to make that decision - more of a right than the Doctor had. Yes, he's always been an interfering so-and-so, but his setting himself up as the highest authority is offensive as hell (I also think his forgiving the Master for what had happened to humanity - even if it's only obliquely - in LOTTL was offensive). I think Harriet's actions could have been an interesting talking point, but I think RTD just wanted his "cute" Belgrano parallel (because the situation is not the same), and to have it simplified to black and white is always a wrong decision.

As for the "pattern", I've watched a lot of RTD things, and this does fit a pattern. But it's not so much them torpedoing her that pisses me off, it's the way they did it. I do think they've been open in casting, but to say that it's all been handled well is simplistic.

I think you're really reducing things to black/white, but I'll step back now. You have a right to your opinion in your LJ.

Post a comment in response:

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
No Subject Icon Selected
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org