rusty_halo: (dw: master: wtf scoffing face)
rusty_halo ([personal profile] rusty_halo) wrote2008-01-25 06:59 pm
Entry tags:

Since I haven't gotten my rant on in quite a while: Doctor Who fandom memes that piss me off

I hate getting into arguments, but Doctor Who fandom is driving me fucking insane. So I'm going to rant here on my own journal, where no one has to see it if they don't want to.

Doctor Who fandom memes, and why they piss me off.

The Doctor was horribly mean to poor Harriet Jones.

Harriet Jones shot a retreating enemy in the back. She annihilated an entire society, including those who hadn't been fighting. Can you imagine if this was common practice? War would never end until one side had been completely destroyed; no one would ever surrender because they'd know they'd just get killed anyway.

Sure, it's easy for a human audience to shrug it off and say, "Well, they were just aliens," but the Doctor isn't human. We're all aliens to him and he saw one alien species behaving badly to another, and he did what he always does: put a stop to it. That's who the Doctor is, someone who sees injustice and acts to end it.

I like and sympathize with Harriet Jones, but she did something wrong, and she paid the price.

If you want to complain that the Doctor has no right to go interfering in alien societies, well, go ahead, but I don't see why you even watch the show, because all the Doctor does is interfere in alien societies.

People also like to complain that the Master's election as Prime Minister was a direct result of the Doctor bringing down Harriet Jones. It's a nice irony, but come on. If the Doctor could bring Jones down with six words, you really think the Master couldn't with fifteen satellites?

The Doctor and Rose deserved to be torn apart in "Doomsday" because of their callous behavior in previous episodes.

Oh, honestly. They're in love, they've been through harrowing events and come out stronger, they're traveling around the universe having adventures, and they're giddy and happy to be together. And, being that one of them is the Doctor, they run into trouble. What do they do?

A) Ignore the trouble and go off somewhere else to have more giddy fun.
B) Fix the trouble, help whoever they can, and continue to enjoy themselves while they do it.
C) Realize that the universe is a terrible awful place, and mope around being miserable for an entire season.

A) would be the callous response that a lot of fandom seems to think they did. B) would be the simultaneously compassionate and fun response they actually chose. C) would be the extremely depressing response that a lot of fandom wishes they'd chosen.

I have no problem with the Doctor and Rose being happy together and refusing to hide it. They don't have to help anyone, but they choose to. When someone saves your life, are you going to complain that they're not taking the situation seriously enough, or are you just going to be fucking glad that someone saved your life?

Seriously. They deserve all the fun they can get. The Doctor has saved the universe more times that I can count, and Rose did her own heart-of-the-TARDIS-absorbing universe-saving thing very recently too. This is the first happiness the Doctor's felt since he lost Gallifrey, and I can't believe there are bitter fans begrudging it because... what? They don't like the 'ship? They want everyone to be grim and miserable all the time? They've got some kind of Puritan idea that happiness must be punished?

As for "They brought about their own destruction," please. Queen Victoria brought about their destruction by being close-minded and afraid of anything beyond her own understanding. Torchwood brought about their destruction by being stupid and power hungry. The Doctor and Rose didn't do anything wrong. If they hadn't been there, Victoria would have been bitten and Britain would be ruled by werewolves. (LOL.) Instead, the Doctor and Rose showed up and saved the country, and what did they get? Banished. Torchwood resulted, and Torchwood tore them apart, which is tragic, and ironic, but it's certainly not their fault.

The Doctor brought up Rose constantly throughout season three.

He really didn't. He brought up Rose two times at the very beginning of the season, when he was still reeling from having lost her. Once in "Smith and Jones" and once in "The Shakespeare Code," the first two episodes.

He also said her name when other people asked about her--Donna in "The Runaway Bride" and Jack in "Utopia." Then the Master brought her up in "Last of the Time Lords," Martha brought her up in "Gridlock," and John Smith drew her in "Human Nature." So the show certainly didn't forget about her, but neither was the Doctor constantly yacking about her. The Doctor himself, of his own volition, only brought her up twice.

And why shouldn't she be mentioned? She was the first person the Doctor truly connected with since the Time War. Whether you like it or not, she had a huge impact on his life, and it would be ridiculous for the show to brush it off and pretend she wasn't important.

The Doctor never appreciated Martha.

Oh, except all those times he said "Thank you" and told her how much he appreciated her.

When people say this, what they mean is "The Doctor never fucked Martha." Which is a ship-war argument and is completely immune to logic.

The Doctor brings death and destruction wherever he goes, and leaves disaster behind him for others to clean up.

Oh, now this one is just silly. The Doctor goes where there is already (about to be) death and destruction, finds himself in the middle of it, and does what he can to help. It's a simple matter of cause and effect. The Doctor doesn't cause the tragedy; he just finds himself in bad situations and makes them better than they would've been without him. This doesn't stop people who only see a small part of the picture from assuming that the Doctor must be responsible, but they're just plain wrong.

As for leaving a mess behind--well, the mess was going to be there anyway. He's already taken the time to help the situation, right whatever wrong was going on; why should this imply an additional obligation to stick around and rebuild? It's not his place to go around rebuilding everyone else's societies anyway, and part of what the Doctor does is teach others how to help themselves. That would hardly work if he just hovered around forever doing everything for them.

The Doctor really thinks he's a god, his behavior is unacceptably arrogant, and he needs to be brought down.

Oh my god, what show are these people watching? He knows perfectly well that he isn't a god. He knew it when Rose was torn away from him forever. He knew it when he couldn't bring Astrid back. He knew it when he had to kill his entire species in order to save the universe. Seriously, if he were a god, he'd have been able to stop these horrible things from happening.

But what makes him the Doctor is that he keeps trying anyway. He's not a god, but in nearly every situation he encounters, he's the most powerful being in the room. This isn't arrogance; it's fact. He accepts that (to paraphrase Peter Parker's Uncle Ben) this power comes with responsibility. He acts to the best of his ability, even though he's not perfect, because he knows it's better to do something than to do nothing. How can you complain about arrogance when it manifests as "trying to save as many people as possible"?

Sometimes he screws up. Sometimes he does everything he possibly can but it's still not enough. Just about every time, though, he helps. He makes the situation better than it would have been without him. He can't save everyone on the Titanic, but he saves a few passengers and, oh yeah, the entire Earth. Do people really think the situation would have been better if the Doctor hadn't "arrogantly" tried to help? Because we'd all be dead if he hadn't.

As far as him deserving to be brought down? No, he doesn't deserve it. But he gets brought down anyway, or did you miss the look on his face when Astrid turned into stardust? When he realized Rose was gone forever? When the Master died in his arms? Every time he thinks of Gallifrey?

***

The other thing that's annoying me today: the fact that every time Doctor Who shows up on Fandom Wank, it turns into a big Rose-bashing extravaganza. It's just an excuse for a bunch of ugly grudgewank from bitter Martha fans, who are far more wanky than those they're mocking.

***

(Comments of whatever sort are fine, but as this is more of a rant than a reasoned argument meant to convince others, I'll probably not respond to anything too argumentative.)

[Cross-posted to InsaneJournal]

[identity profile] katesutton.livejournal.com 2008-01-27 03:51 am (UTC)(link)
This is truth. Parts of fandom have always baffled me with their strange, shrunken version of Rose Tyler, one unlike any I remember seeing onscreen in season one or two. But the reaction in some quarters to season three has really staggered me with the near-reversal of their Ten-adoration. It's disconcerting to watch fans despise the Doctor for just...not being who they thought he was. Surprise! He's flawed! He has emotions that get the better of him at times. I don't think this is going to change when Ten goes away.

[identity profile] biichan.livejournal.com 2008-01-27 04:04 am (UTC)(link)
Your rant is a good example of why I've pretty much gone over to the Classic Who side of the fandom.

[identity profile] kousuke-blade.livejournal.com 2008-01-27 04:43 am (UTC)(link)
You are my new best friend.

I just recently got involved in the fandom (sometime in mid-December) but I've seen nearly every episode and while I try to avoid all the bitter bickering amongst fans, I haven't been able to ignore it.

All of your points make complete sense and it's nice to see some logic and looking at matters from both sides of the story instead of people going, "Well I think this so I must be right and refuse to listen to anyone else." -sigh- Seriously?

When people say this, what they mean is "The Doctor never fucked Martha." Which is a ship-war argument and is completely immune to logic.

I couldn't have said it better myself. Really, perfect. I have heard that Martha wasn't appreciated so many times and while it's true it was an unrequited love (or whatever fans want to call it), it doesn't mean the Doctor felt nothing for her.

That last topic you discussed is all too true. He claims to be a 'genius' (which he is respectively) but it's not in an arrogant way. Everyone does that and it doesn't make them egotistical braggarts of any sort.

The other thing that's annoying me today: the fact that every time Doctor Who shows up on Fandom Wank, it turns into a big Rose-bashing extravaganza.

D: I have noticed this all too much and it gets me quite sad actually. Not just because I adore the character of Rose but because it's often in spite of those who happen to like Rose and not based on any logical reasoning as to why Rose deserves not to be liked.

Reading this and getting tidbits off my chest made me feel better. Haha. This was very much needed, thanks.

[identity profile] bippy24.livejournal.com 2008-01-27 08:45 am (UTC)(link)
Here via whodaily, and I don't really have anything to add except that I totally agree with everything you've said. And you say it much better than I ever could. Thank you!

[identity profile] notfromvenus.livejournal.com 2008-01-27 09:02 am (UTC)(link)
It's crazy, isn't it? Makes me almost long for the wank just being over what media are canon or whether Colin Baker was any good. All this companion war crap is really too much.

That being said, I'm going to agree with some things and not with others..... I think sometimes you might have missed the point a bit.

1) The Sycorax ship was a slaver ship, not their entire society. She wasn't exactly committing genocide against innocents by destroying it. Also, and maybe more to the point: she's only met the Doctor once before... unlike the audience, she doesn't know that she can trust him or that he almost always wins. Maybe it wasn't the moral thing to do, but I think it was understandable.

2) As far as Rose and the Doctor's behavior.... the way "B" is realized is actually the option people are complaining about, not "A" (which you're right, didn't happen"). Because they were pretty proud and smug in S2, to the point that some people found it grating. I think that was intentional character development, honestly, to kind of prep people for her departure. But that doesn't mean she "deserved" to be stuck in another universe, no.

4) Yeah, it does annoy me when people say that. He did care about Martha. Maybe not as much as he did about Rose, but realistically - everybody cares about some of their friends more than others. That's life, it happens. But I think some people view that as a rejection (and if they strongly identify with her, a rejecion of themselves).

6) Oh god, I hate this one! I mean, yeah, the Doctor's arrogant - but you know, he is better than most people he runs into. He's always been arrogant, but in him it's an endearing trait, somehow. It's not unacceptable or unreasonable, and he doesn't at all need to be "brought down".

[identity profile] nina-ds.livejournal.com 2008-01-27 04:34 pm (UTC)(link)
Some of this I can agree with; some I think I would nuance a bit; but this...

Harriet Jones shot a retreating enemy in the back.

Yes, she did.

She annihilated an entire society, including those who hadn't been fighting.

Uh, no, as I recall she shot a slaving ship. They were trawling the universe for slaves to take back to their society. If Harriet hadn't shot them, they probably would have gone on to another planet to enslave (that's why, even if she did annihilate an entire society, she's still done the universe a favour), or to tell their home planet where Earth was and send reinforcements. Would it have protected Earth forever? No. Bought a bit of time? Probably. It's a grey area. It's probably the best solution given those parameters. The Doctor is not always around.

For me, it's not so much because I like Harriet in the show that it pisses me off. It's because once again RTD created a strong middle-aged female character and then used a sexist, agist, back-stabbing way to get rid of her. Whether or not she could have held off the Saxon invasion is neither here nor there to me. I just thought it was distasteful, both inside and outside of the show.

I also find Ten a little genocide-happy himself, and his being emo doesn't really excuse it.

[identity profile] sunnytyler001.livejournal.com 2008-01-27 04:50 pm (UTC)(link)
God I SO agree with you!!!
It's like the Doctor had to apology to Martha because he wasn't in love with her.
I mean, love is not something you choose. It's not logical.. You just fall in love and that's it.
And if you watch again series three, you'll see Ten trusted martha a lot more than he has ever trusted Rose. When he'll put his life, Jack's and the world's fate between Martha's hands, he'll just send Rose back home. People can argue he wasn't very nice with miss Jones in "Human nature", but he wasn't himself... while he was very much the Doctor when he left Rose & Mickey, with no hope of ever seeing him again in "The girl in the fireplace".

[identity profile] ionlylurkhere.livejournal.com 2008-01-27 05:55 pm (UTC)(link)
Hmm. I can't comment sensibly on the Rose stuff, 'cos I don't share your premise about what their relationship was about. But ...

Those last two seem to me Cartmel-era/NA readings of the Doctor that can be applied to the new series if you want. They're certainly not definitively wrong.

As to Martha, she certainly felt unappreciated; she tells us so explicitly at the end of LotTL. So at the very least, the Doctor didn't manage to make her understand his appreciation (which fits with his general not-always-getting-emotions thing).

(Anonymous) 2008-01-27 06:08 pm (UTC)(link)
You're just jellus cos the only person the Master fucked was LUCY.

[identity profile] mojotastic.livejournal.com 2008-01-27 11:11 pm (UTC)(link)
WORD times a thousand! I got here through a link and I have to say that I agree with just about everything you've said here.

Who fandom, in my opinion, is mostly just nasty and prentenious. The fact that they are constantly bringing real life important issues like racism into things is frankly insulting.

Also, for all Martha fans complain about her treatment, I think the attitude that Martha has to hook up with the Doctor or earn his romantic love to be deemed worthy is insane. Why is it that the only way that one female character is seen as equal to another is if they win the love of the same man? Why does the Doctor not having romantic feelings for Martha make her less awesome? Does the Doctor's romance with Rose make her *more* awesome? Why?

Why do Martha fans, who seem to grip about sexism/racism/any-ism all the time, reduce their favorite female character down to whether or not a certain guy likes her *that way*? Is the only way that the Doctor can "appreciate" Martha by giving her some lovin? I don't get this attitude.

As a character Martha was shown to be a cool chick that the Doctor thought was awesome. Ten treated her a lot nicer, I would wager, than Nine treated Rose (even with the romantic undertones). So WTF Who fandom?

Whatever. If Who fandom didn't have something to complain about I'm fairly sure it would just implode from lack of wank. I can't wait until they can figure out various ways of hating on Donna next season. I already heard that Donna-as-companion is racist because she's a ginger, whitest of all white people. I wish I was joking.

(PS: Bitter me? I'm sane I swear! This fandom has just driven me crazy from the brief glimpses I've had of it.)
ext_6531: (Default)

[identity profile] lizbee.livejournal.com 2008-01-28 01:10 am (UTC)(link)
This rant is a fine demonstration of the subjective nature of television. Which is to say, I don't know what version of the show you were watching, but I'm glad it's not the one I got.

Or, to be less obnoxious: I totally disagree. *retreats back to OldSchool fandom*

[identity profile] humansrsuperior.livejournal.com 2008-01-28 06:23 am (UTC)(link)
You, my friend, seriously kick ass! *showers you with cookies and candy and many pretty things* I am in 100% agreement with everything you've stated (it's all SO true!). Thanks so much for the fabulous read. =D

[identity profile] orange-crushed.livejournal.com 2008-01-28 08:20 pm (UTC)(link)
Followed a link here and I'm glad I did- everything you've laid out is something I've felt for a while, and you articulated it very well.

Also, this: The Doctor really thinks he's a god, his behavior is unacceptably arrogant, and he needs to be brought down.

Your takedown is so good ! Because I can't understand where the hell people get that from. If anything (at least in my Rose-colored glasses section of fandom... hee) there are a lot of people who want to see the Doctor brought up in season three, or to at least have a few things go his way. ;) Because he struggles and he fails and he takes things hard- he can't save everyone, and it's so obvious how deeply he feels that. He's been lonely and struggling, so I personally think it's time he has a bit of a vacation.

A fun vacation, with screaming and plastic monsters, but you know what I mean. ;)


I'm tired of Rose-bashing, too. It's just petty and cruel, and I never understand it- she was sweet. She was good. She was flawed and human and fun, she screwed up sometimes but she didn't give up; she loved the Doctor and loved adventure and laughter and travel and exploration; and that's what people hate her for ?

This whole thing you've written just gets my thumbs-up.

[identity profile] violet-lane.livejournal.com 2008-01-28 09:34 pm (UTC)(link)
Thanks so much for posting this! You rock and so does your meta. <3

[identity profile] nightrider101.livejournal.com 2008-02-03 06:09 pm (UTC)(link)
yes, Yes, YES!!!! Thank you! This is everything I feel about DW! You just worded it much better than I ever could. I'm so sick of fan wars I could vomit. Honestly, why even watch the show? And if I have to read one more 'The Doctor is a complete bastard' fic, I'm going to have a mental breakdown.

Page 2 of 2