![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Seriously, how is it okay for someone to say "I don't care about Spike, and I'm upset that he's taking time away from my characters," but when a Spike fan says "I don't care about Angel, and I'm worried about Spike's characterization" that makes us RABID SPIKE FEN? The double standard right there is plain as day. It's okay for them to worry about their characters, but it's somehow wrong for us to worry that our character is getting shafted? On what planet is that fair?
You know what else? I've watched BtVS and AtS both from their very first episodes, minus some lulls where I got bored or fell asleep in the middle. It's not like I'm hopping on the bandwagon and not knowing anything about the show; I watch the show. But now that Spike's here, for the first time, I actually care about the show.
I suppose some people out there watch the show and love every character equally. But most of us identify with one or two characters in particular and care most about their stories. And again, I ask, if the character I happen to care about is Spike, why does that mean there's something wrong with me? There's nothing wrong with a Wesley fan caring most about Wesley, or an Angel fan caring most about Angel. I'm not going to hold that against them. But why, when it's Spike, is it a problem?
And, oh yes, why is there something wrong with me if I don't care about Buffy/Angel/Wes/Lorne/whoever? I see this all the time; you're a "bad fan" if you don't care about Buffy. Huh? Says who? I find her behavior horrific and her personality loathesome. Why does this make me a rotten nasty person?--I dislike her precisely because her behavior offends my morality! It's like, how dare I have an opinion that's not all sunshine and roses and praise Joss? And no one bitches about the Buffy fans who go on about how they can't stand that evil nasty Spike, but it's wrong for the Spike fans to dislike Buffy? Why? The only reason I can see is that she's prioritized by the narrative, she's in the title, etc., but that is just not relevant to me because authorial intent is not my method of interpreting a text. The writers may want me to care mostly about Buffy, but if she falls flat to me and Spike feels real and meaningful, then I'm going to care about Spike.
Y'know, part of the reason I like these shows is that they make me think. And part of thinking means being critical. It would be pretty damn lame (and dishonest with myself) if I watched every episode going "Yay! Joss is wonderful! Everything is so good!" Um, no. BtVS made me think a whole lot about morality and ethics and remorse and atonement and different varieties of feminism and the media's portrayal of "girl power!" and my idea of a strong women and what defines an equal relationship and how does power function in society and a whole lot of interesting things that I might never have considered before. And a lot of the time, the reason I considered these really interesting issues was that I found something disturbing or upsetting in the way BtVS was written and I tried to figure out why it upset me. I really disapprove of the way feminism has been portrayed on BtVS and it's made me think about what feminism means to me, and even though my opinion is negative in regards to BtVS it's been a positive and enlightening realization for me as a person.
So anyway. The whole idea that I'm not allowed to be critical and I have to approve of everything Joss does is just bull, and would significantly take away from my understanding of the show and my ways of interacting with the text. I don't hold it against anyone who does view the show this way, likes all the characters, whatever; it's their right. I respect that. But my opinion is just as valid too.
And really. How would you appreciate being called RABID ANGEL FEN? RABID WESLEY FEN? RABID BUFFY FEN? It's fucking rude. We all have our favorite characters; quit judging the ones that you personally don't like.
You know what else? I've watched BtVS and AtS both from their very first episodes, minus some lulls where I got bored or fell asleep in the middle. It's not like I'm hopping on the bandwagon and not knowing anything about the show; I watch the show. But now that Spike's here, for the first time, I actually care about the show.
I suppose some people out there watch the show and love every character equally. But most of us identify with one or two characters in particular and care most about their stories. And again, I ask, if the character I happen to care about is Spike, why does that mean there's something wrong with me? There's nothing wrong with a Wesley fan caring most about Wesley, or an Angel fan caring most about Angel. I'm not going to hold that against them. But why, when it's Spike, is it a problem?
And, oh yes, why is there something wrong with me if I don't care about Buffy/Angel/Wes/Lorne/whoever? I see this all the time; you're a "bad fan" if you don't care about Buffy. Huh? Says who? I find her behavior horrific and her personality loathesome. Why does this make me a rotten nasty person?--I dislike her precisely because her behavior offends my morality! It's like, how dare I have an opinion that's not all sunshine and roses and praise Joss? And no one bitches about the Buffy fans who go on about how they can't stand that evil nasty Spike, but it's wrong for the Spike fans to dislike Buffy? Why? The only reason I can see is that she's prioritized by the narrative, she's in the title, etc., but that is just not relevant to me because authorial intent is not my method of interpreting a text. The writers may want me to care mostly about Buffy, but if she falls flat to me and Spike feels real and meaningful, then I'm going to care about Spike.
Y'know, part of the reason I like these shows is that they make me think. And part of thinking means being critical. It would be pretty damn lame (and dishonest with myself) if I watched every episode going "Yay! Joss is wonderful! Everything is so good!" Um, no. BtVS made me think a whole lot about morality and ethics and remorse and atonement and different varieties of feminism and the media's portrayal of "girl power!" and my idea of a strong women and what defines an equal relationship and how does power function in society and a whole lot of interesting things that I might never have considered before. And a lot of the time, the reason I considered these really interesting issues was that I found something disturbing or upsetting in the way BtVS was written and I tried to figure out why it upset me. I really disapprove of the way feminism has been portrayed on BtVS and it's made me think about what feminism means to me, and even though my opinion is negative in regards to BtVS it's been a positive and enlightening realization for me as a person.
So anyway. The whole idea that I'm not allowed to be critical and I have to approve of everything Joss does is just bull, and would significantly take away from my understanding of the show and my ways of interacting with the text. I don't hold it against anyone who does view the show this way, likes all the characters, whatever; it's their right. I respect that. But my opinion is just as valid too.
And really. How would you appreciate being called RABID ANGEL FEN? RABID WESLEY FEN? RABID BUFFY FEN? It's fucking rude. We all have our favorite characters; quit judging the ones that you personally don't like.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-16 04:38 pm (UTC)And really. How would you appreciate being called RABID ANGEL FEN? RABID WESLEY FEN? RABID BUFFY FEN? It's fucking rude. We all have our favorite characters; quit judging the ones that you personally don't like.
The fans of all the characters have some fucked up people. I'm tired of Spike's fans being the scapegoat for the entire fandom, though (kind of like I get tired of MS being the scapegoat for the entire South).
Anyway, throwing my support in with you.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-16 04:50 pm (UTC)Anyway, thanks.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-16 04:54 pm (UTC)I get really pissed by this because I've watched Angel from S1. I am an AtS fan. I just like Spike, well, a helluva lot more. Sue me.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-16 04:39 pm (UTC)*sits in corner and quietly loves Spike*
(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-16 04:39 pm (UTC)And Joss is STILL a fucktard (as I told JM in Tampa).
(((hugs)))
(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-16 04:42 pm (UTC)How did he react? I must know.
On the main topic, I'm sorry fandom is getting you down, Laura. That's why I often avoid the general MEverse sites--people are so nasty and cruel about Spike, and that just upsets me. I don't like being upset, so I stay in the Spikey places, where it's relatively calm.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-16 04:59 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-16 05:33 pm (UTC)Anyway, I know what you mean. I am so fucking sick of being characterized as a cheekbones-loving drolling hormone bomb. I love the character for who he is, not who plays him. As I've said before, JM may be an awesome actor who infuses his lines with every bit of soul, but it was Joss (the fucktard TM
(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-16 05:40 pm (UTC)If it saves your sanity, you should definitely trim your friends page. I myself consider my LJ friends list one of my only refuges from Spike haters. At least I have some control over who goes and who stays, unlike TWOP or other messageboards.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-16 05:12 pm (UTC)Actually, I'm not sure if the comment registered on JM, since I had just delivered myself of a small rant about how offensive I found "Chosen" - from a distance of about six inches from those eyes, I might add - which had effectively wiped the sexy grin right off his face. I really managed to freak him out!
(pats self on back for retaining sanity under such extreme conditions, and also feels gratitude toward whatever screwed up photographer's camera thus creating opportunity to say more than "guh")
In fact, Mr. Cheekbones was so stunned and shocked by my *death issues* and description of bad flashbacks to my daughter's death, that he promptly started blaming himself and his *bad acting for any and all defects in the finale. Well, at least until I threatened to kick his ass. *veg*
Ergo, my comment that "it's not YOUR fault that your boss is a fucktard" may have gone right over his head! Whoooosh!
(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-16 05:14 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-16 05:43 pm (UTC)I think that's one reason he's glad to being back to snarky sidekick mode this season--it has to be less hard on him emotionally.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-16 05:48 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-16 05:54 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-16 05:49 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-16 06:02 pm (UTC)You already know I love you, but it always bears repeating. ;-)
(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-16 06:34 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-16 09:57 pm (UTC)Thank you! Spike&Fred4eVA!!111!!!!
Yours is pretty too. :-)
(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-16 05:39 pm (UTC){looks around at pile of bodies in corner & mentally moves furniture around to make more room}
And again, I ask, if the character I happen to care about is Spike, why does that mean there's something wrong with me?
obviously because he is simply a shiny blond thing, whose only purpose on the show is to suck in gullible viewers like you who only like him for his extensive nekkidness. i mean, he's so obviously just a cheap angel knock-off with no personality or storyline of his own, right?
And really. How would you appreciate being called RABID ANGEL FEN? RABID WESLEY FEN? RABID BUFFY FEN? It's fucking rude.
yeah! i mean... what the hell is wrong with having rabies? huh? just because i foam at the mouth a lot and have the urge to kill everything i see... that doesn't make me a bad person, dammit! some people with rabies go on to lead healthy, productive lives despite the foaming and the killing. grouping us with fans of a t.v. show is just plain insensitive!
:-)
(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-16 05:46 pm (UTC)Amen on that. We're all entitled to have our own favorite characters-- and yet, I see a lot of other fans ridiculing and judging the Spike fans more than any other. We're classified as drooling rabid fangirls for defending our character, or even just enjoying seeing him with screentime.
I like almost all of the other characters on AtS, in varying degrees. But just because I'm not Angel or Wes's biggest fan, I don't get mad at people who are or label them as pathetic.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-16 05:47 pm (UTC)Unfortunately, at the moment, ME seem pretty determined to give them more ammuntion to hurl at us.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-16 06:00 pm (UTC)See my secret is I didn't watch Buffy for Buffy, I respect her, I sympathize with the character but I don't particularly like her. I love Spike, I would happily sit in a pub with him and get plastered, same goes for Angel. I think Angel would be a blast drunk. I was over the moon to hear that Spike was coming to live in LA. I will miss Xander, Giles and Willow but thats what the fanficton is there for..if you don't like it write your own. Chrips sorry for the rant lass...basicly I agree with you and still stand confussed at the whole ho-ha
(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-17 03:40 pm (UTC)My opinion is that we all have the right to our preferences and it is elitist and stupid to go around classifying and judging other groups of fans because they watch the show differently than you.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-16 06:21 pm (UTC)So hugs to you, Laura, and I'm sorry someone has pissed you off. But at the same time, I love reading your rants, so I'm secretly thrilled.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-17 03:43 pm (UTC)I've done a good job of avoiding the nasty people so it was just a shock to see it on my friends list. (Someone not on my friends list anymore, of course. I don't mind people who disagree, but there's no need for that kind of rude, judgemental elitism.)
(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-16 07:24 pm (UTC)I felt that way about Spike to an extent as well. Hell - I helped count and analyze his frickin' headtilts for a year. There was feeling there, but just not the same intense *guh* I have for Angel. And part of this is my fault - I hung out on Spike-centric boards, because my friends are all Spike-centric and that was fine for a while as well, because I *like* Spike. I swooned over "Beneath You" and I accepted "Seeing Red" when I read
So I get where you are coming from. I'm the same way about Angel. Call him ugly. Call him stupid. Call his character wooden and I chafe. But I don't see where being an Angel fan means I am anti-Spike. And I don't see why in order to be a Spike fan, you have to despise Angel. And finally, thru LJ, I've found some people that feel the same way and sanity is restored to my viewing habits.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-16 08:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-16 09:08 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-16 11:11 pm (UTC)And, sigh! I hoped they'd do more with Angel and Spike this season than have them hating each other.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-17 12:23 am (UTC)See, I disagree with this - Angel is dark and has done things in the past on the show (locking the lawyers in with Darla and Dru, kidnapping the head of W&H and getting his torture implements ready, opening the portal to Hortagh (or however it is spelled), and hell, the mindwipe, to name a few) that let you know that he is never all that removed from his demon. I absolutely believe that is the direction the show is going in once again - into the evil of Angel (and not in the sanitized "this is Angel and this is Angelus" way that his friends seem to want to categorize him). I couldn't be more thrilled, but at the same time I want the exploration of Spike's darkness to be an issue as well - but I'm big on the duality. Of all the main characters - Angel has done the most evil in the course of the series. It has nothing to do with his suffering - it just is what he is. Now that we have Spike - who also in effect - is what Angel is - I am so freakin stoked about what they can do with that. I want them both to reach down into their hearts and feel the darkness and then preferably tear into each other. It's not hate and it's not love. It's that they are the same. Different paths and different personalities to be sure, but the instincts and the pain and the, the - well - that thing - the knowledge of their damnation (which is a very big thing for me, and probably isn't for a lot of other people) - that there is no redemption and where do you go from there? - that is shared.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-17 12:51 am (UTC)Exactly. That was kinda what I thought this season was about (well other than TEH GAY ;D) but yeah. I was surprised when people freaked about the title "Just Rewards" thinking it was all "Angel deserves stuff and bwhahaha Spike goes to hell." When I was thinking "See they'd both go to hell, neither of them deserve stuf! No matter what they do it's gonna bite them on thier pretty asses! The title is meant to be ironic or something!" *loves sisabet*
(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-17 12:56 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-17 06:46 pm (UTC)"No matter how good a boy you are - God doesn't want you! But I still do."
Season 2, man. It's all there.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-17 07:04 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-17 01:09 am (UTC)I'm a Spike fan.
I'm also an Angel fan. In fact, I'm an A/S slasher. I love then both. I'm so into the stratosphere with the Ho!Yay that I'm having problems coming down to earth.
I'm also an AtS fan. I love the show. I love the characters. I love the stories, I love the arcs, heck, I pretty much love everything about it.
Does the fact that I'm a Spike fan makes me any less a fan of AtS? No, it doesn't. As far as I'm concerned, it's a far better show than BtVS.
However, the feeling I keep getting is that the fact that I'm a Spike fan somehow taints me in the eyes of AtS viewers. Like my opinions are of lesser value because I happen to like Spike. "Oh she's just a Spike fan."
Are there a lot of insane Spike fans out there? Yes, there are. However we're not all like this. And see, there you go right there. I automatically feel the need to point this out - like it shouldn't be obvious from the start.
There are plenty of us who are both intelligent and capable of being objective about this character. I have no illusions that he is a flawed one. Man! He's a total jerk sometimes. He is also an amazingly complex character who totally fascinates me. And I really can't understand how anyone fails to see this.
So I get defensive. Specially, because many of the analysis going around lately seem to be really prejudiced ones.
It's like AtS fans don't even want to give the character a break. See how it turns out. It's all "he's going to ruin the show" blah, blah, blah.
And I? I see nothing of the kind. So, fair enough, I haven't seen 5x03 yet (some of us have to download the thing because we live on the other side of Atlantic). But 5x02? Rocked the fucking house!
But then I went to read the reviews and hu? Seems like I'm the only one who liked it.
Because apparently no one got that "I want it to end" meant "Lets stop fighting because I'm on your side now. So I have this plan for us to get that necromancer." And that that meant Spike was risking going to Hell because he wanted to do the right thing.
But the reviews were all " 'I want it to end?' It doesn't make sense!!! Seeee! He's ruining the show already!"
Well, color me stunned. Where was the objective analysis?
So my reaction there was "Please get off of your high horse and try to be objective, okay?"
And yes, this is a very rude thing to say. But the reviews came off as pretty rude too. And the whole attitude toward us, Spike fans, and our opinions was that they didn't count because well "you're just a rabid Spike fan". And really. That's bound to piss us off.
I'm not denying that I am a fan. Because I am. I just get upset with the assumption that my opinions don't count/are not as relevant/are not intelligent because I am a Spike fan. I resent that.
I'm not trying to offend you or anything. And if I did I apologize. Because that was not my intention.
And besides I agree with you. I want the darkness. Anyone under the impression that this is going to "lead to hugs and puppies", well, wake up and smell the coffee.
I like my Spike dark. And I like my Angel dark. AtS season 2 is still the best one, IMO.
Also, kinda OT but actually not: "Closer" is so brilliant that it makes me want to built you a shrine. And if what you wanted to do was show how very alike their paths are, congratulations, you totally succeeded. And why, why are you not directing that show??
(Everyone please bear in mind that it's 2 A.M. in my part of the world. And therefore indulgence time. So if this post doesn't make sense, that is why.)
(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-17 01:27 am (UTC)But I'm an AtS fan and I like Spike - yes some fans don't - but by far they are not the majority - just perhaps the most vocal where you are. I know that was the case for me, an Angel fan, last year. It got fairly bashy and sucky and eventually I gave up. Which was probably the correct reaction.
Thank you so much about "Closer"
(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-17 01:49 am (UTC)Anyway. Only thing wrong with this season, as far as I'm concerned?
No Lindsey. Now that's just tragic. *sigh*
(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-17 02:04 am (UTC)